- 47 - (2) Petitioner diverted substantial amounts of money from his related corporations, Alviso and GMT. To hide the character of these funds petitioner gave a portion of these diverted funds back to his corporations, labeling those funds as loans. To that end, petitioner purposely misled his accountants as to the true nature of these funds. For example, on one of GMT’s bank statements for the account into which a $50,000 check was deposited, there is a handwritten notation that the corporation’s bookkeeper made which reads “Art [the accountant]- George put this money out of pocket - don’t credit as income. We’re going to pay our line of credit monthly out of this account, Yvonne.” (3) Petitioner garnered significant funds over a 3-year period from his solely owned, unincorporated business Newark T&B, and he failed to report any income earned therefrom. Petitioner characterized this endeavor on his income tax returns Schedules E as a “lot”. Furthermore, petitioner failed to maintain proper books and records for this business. (4) Petitioner maintained an automobile racing business, which also earned him substantial sums of income. Again, 53(...continued) very least vague and ill-informing. This statement speaks only to petitioner’s inability “TO REPORT HIS SHARE OF THE PARTNERSHIP’S ACTIVITY FOR THE 1990 TAX YEAR.” The statement does not communicate that in 1990 petitioner received at least $300,000 of value in exchange for his interest, a transaction which is clearly not a “partnership activity”. Furthermore, the statement refers only to Tri-City and not to Newark Wreckers.Page: Previous 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011