- 80 - Stewart’s manager and, in 1998, represented Mr. Stewart in contract litigation against Mr. Menard. Like Mr. Caponigro, Mr. Agajanian examined the 1997 and 1998 Joyce Julius yearend sponsor reports on television exposure value but cautioned that the Joyce Julius reports are intended for comparisons between brands and do not set firm advertising values. Moreover, Mr. Agajanian explained, the Joyce Julius reports do not account for other forms of exposure, including newspapers, magazines, radio, internet, and racing fans’ brand loyalty. According to Mr. Agajanian, the “normally accepted premise” regarding racing media exposure is that television constitutes 40 percent to 50 percent of total sponsor media exposure. Applying the 50-percent premise to Menards’s Joyce Julius television exposure values for 1997 and 1998, Mr. Agajanian estimated that Menards’s total media exposure value from its involvement with TMI was $16,914,000 for 1997 and $7,036,000 for 1998. Mr. Agajanian attributed the difference between Menards’s exposure values for 1997 and 1998 to Menards’s having more wins and leading more laps in 1997. In addition to television exposure, Mr. Agajanian’s report discussed another factor affecting sponsorship values, the market-driven nature of sponsorship pricing. He explained that winning or leading cars gain “millions of dollars of exposure”Page: Previous 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011