Menard, Inc. - Page 84

                                       - 81 -                                         
          from the live audience and worldwide television and radio                   
          broadcasts of the races and, as a result, charge higher                     
          sponsorship fees.  Mr. Agajanian estimated that Indy sponsorship            
          fees for the competitive teams in the 1997 and 1998 IRL seasons             
          ranged from $3 million to $6 million per car.  For the Indy                 
          teams, in general, during the 1997 and 1998 IRL seasons, Mr.                
          Agajanian explained, the total fees ranged from $2 million to $10           
          million per car.                                                            
               Mr. Agajanian concluded that the amount Menards spent on the           
          TMI expenses was reasonable, especially when considering TMI’s              
          “dominant performance” during 1997 and 1998.  Assuming that                 
          Menards spent between $5 million and $7 million each year for two           
          cars, Mr. Agajanian compared that price of $2.5 million to $3.5             
          million per car to the market price and determined that Menards             
          “more than received fair value” in exchange for the TMI payments.           
                         b.  Value of Sponsorship Benefits Menards Received           
               Relying on Mr. Caponigro’s and Mr. Agajanian’s expert                  
          reports, petitioners argue that, in light of the media exposure             
          Menards received through its involvement with TMI and other                 
          advertising benefits, the TMI expenses were reasonable in amount.           
          However, respondent criticizes the expert reports, calling Mr.              
          Agajanian’s report “vague and unsupported” and questioning Mr.              
          Agajanian’s impartiality due to his business relationship with              
          Mr. Menard.  Respondent argues that the experts should have                 






Page:  Previous  71  72  73  74  75  76  77  78  79  80  81  82  83  84  85  86  87  88  89  90  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011