Nield and Linda Montgomery - Page 14

                                       - 14 -                                         
               To date petitioners have not had an opportunity to “dispute”           
          their tax liability for the taxable year 2000 in any sense of the           
          term.  Although petitioners reported the tax liability that is              
          the subject of respondent’s proposed levy on their original tax             
          return, they now contend (and would like the opportunity to show)           
          that they erred in computing the tax attributable to certain                
          stock options that Mr. Montgomery exercised in 2000.  The record            
          does not reflect whether respondent has given consideration to              
          petitioners’ amended tax return for 2000 and their claim that               
          their original return contained an error.  In sum, we hold that             
          section 6330(c)(2)(B) permits petitioners to challenge the                  
          existence or amount of the tax liability reported on their                  
          original income tax return because they have not received a                 
          notice of deficiency for 2000 and they have not otherwise had an            
          opportunity to dispute the tax liability in question.5                      


               5  We also observe that carving out self-assessed amounts              
          from the term “underlying tax liability” under sec.                         
          6330(c)(2)(B), as respondent would have us do, does not comport             
          with the use of that term in sec. 6311 which deals with the                 
          payment of tax by commercially acceptable means.  Like sec. 6330,           
          it is another provision of the Code relating to collection.                 
          Specifically, sec. 6311(d)(3)(A) provides in relevant part that             
          “a payment of internal revenue taxes * * * by use of a credit               
          card shall not be subject to section 161 of the Truth in Lending            
          Act * * * if the error alleged by the person is an error relating           
          to the underlying tax liability”.  Similarly, sec. 6311(d)(3)(C)            
          provides in relevant part that “a payment of internal revenue               
          taxes * * * by use of a debit card shall not be subject to                  
          section 908 of the Electronic Fund Transfer Act * * * if the                
          error alleged by the person is an error relating to the                     
          underlying tax liability”.  In both instances, use of the term              
                                                             (continued...)           




Page:  Previous  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011