John R. and Patricia G. Okerson - Page 7

                                        - 7 -                                         
               Supplemental Final Decree of Divorce, entered March 13,                
               1995, contained language as follows:                                   
                         “5.   In the event BARBARA BUHR OKERSON                      
                    should die before JOHN RUSSELL OKERSON has                        
                    satisfied his alimony obligation under this                       
                    agreement, JOHN RUSSELL OKERSON agrees to                         
                    make payments in an amount equal to his                           
                    remaining alimony obligation for or on behalf                     
                    of the education of the parties’ two children                     
                    for a period no longer than the period                            
                    originally scheduled for the alimony payments                     
                    or until the children have completed four                         
                    years of undergraduate collegiate work,                           
                    whichever occurs first.  In the event that a                      
                    child does not pursue her college education                       
                    after BARBARA BUHR OKERSON*s demise then JOHN                     
                    RUSSELL OKERSON*s agreement for continuing                        
                    support payments to that child equal to half                      
                    of the remaining alimony payments shall                           
                    cease.”                                                           
                    5.   It was announced to the Court that said                      
               paragraph quoted above has been construed by the                       
               Internal Revenue Service to question the intent of the                 
               Court in the entry of the Supplemental Final Decree of                 
               Divorce, entered March 13, 1995, that all alimony and                  
               attorney fees paid to Larry Rice, Esq., be tax                         
               deductible to John Russell Okerson and taxable income                  
               to Barbara Buhr Okerson.                                               
                    6.   It further appeared to the Court that said                   
               paragraph five (5) quoted above contains language of                   
               contingency that did not occur and that therefore this                 
               Court should find as fact in this Cause that all of                    
               such alimony paid under the Supplemental Final Decree                  
               of Divorce in this Cause should be tax deductible to                   
               John Russell Okerson and taxable income to Barbara Buhr                
               Okerson.                                                               
                    7.   It further appeared to the Court that in the                 
               Order on Motion for Appellate Attorney*s Fees, entered                 
               October 02, 1997, in which John Russell Okerson was                    
               ordered to pay Larry Rice, then Attorney for Barbara                   
               Buhr Okerson, Thirty-Three Thousand Five Hundred                       
               ($33,500.00) Dollars in installments for appellate                     
               attorney fees, that said Order stated “Said alimony is                 
               taxable to the Defendant and deductible by the                         





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011