- 9 - – Attributable to nonrequesting spouse. Petitioner has failed to show that the remaining 1999 liability is solely attributable to intervenor; conversely, he has failed to establish the extent to which such liability is not attributable to him. This factor is negative. – Significant benefit. There is no evidence bearing upon whether petitioner did or did not significantly benefit from the unpaid 1999 liability. This factor is neutral. – Noncompliance with Federal tax laws. There is no evidence regarding petitioner’s compliance with Federal income tax laws in the tax years following 1999. This factor is neutral. Of the factors listed in section 4.03 of Rev. Proc. 2000-15, one is positive, three are negative, and four are neutral. Petitioner has brought to our attention no circumstances beyond those encapsulated by the section 4.03 factors. Our own judgment, considering those factors, is that it is not inequitable to hold petitioner liable for the unpaid 1999 liability. Respondent therefore did not act arbitrarily, capriciously, or without sound basis in fact by not granting petitioner relief from that liability. III. Conclusion Respondent did not abuse his discretion in denying petitioner equitable relief from the unpaid 1999 liability.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011