Howard H. Thompson, Jr. - Page 14

                                       - 14 -                                         
                         d.  Investment Broker Statements                             
                    4.  That your affiant has also reviewed certain                   
               American Express Credit Card statements of an individ-                 
               ual named Paul Robinson.                                               
                    5.  That it is the professional opinion of your                   
               affiant that corporate funds belonging to Weavewood                    
               have been misappropriated by the Defendant Howard                      
               Thompson.  Your affiants [sic] opinion is based on the                 
               following findings:                                                    
                         a.  That to the best of your affiant’s knowl-                
               edge, since August of 1995, Howard Thompson was never                  
               an employee of Weavewood or in a compensated officer                   
               position of the Company.  However, after reviewing                     
               certain canceled checks and bank statements your                       
               affiant has discovered that Howard Thompson had been                   
               writing checks from the Weavewood account to himself.                  
               The most recent of these incidents occurred on Friday                  
               July 12, 1996, and Tuesday July 16, 1996. * * * Your                   
               affiant has also discovered that on prior occasions,                   
               Howard Thompson has written other checks to himself                    
               from the Weavewood account, [and] after your affiant                   
               has had an opportunity to review all of the canceled                   
               checks an opinion as to the exact amount can be given                  
               to this court if requested.                                            
                         b.  That Virgene Thompson does have a compen-                
               sated position at Weavewood.  Your affiant has discov-                 
               ered that a number of checks from Weavewood have been                  
               written to Virgene Thompson, [and] after consulting                    
               with Ms. Thompson, she has advised your affiant that                   
               she has not received any monies from the company since                 
               August of 1995.  Attached hereto are three checks                      
               written to Virgene Thompson.[4]                                        
                         c.  That after reviewing certain canceled                    
               checks, bank statements and credit card statements,                    

               4Three of the checks attached to Mr. Caylor’s affidavit were           
          the same three checks discussed supra note 3 that were attached             
          to Ms. Thompson’s supplemental affidavit.  We note that the                 
          $1,000 check, the date of which is not shown in the Court’s copy            
          of the attachments to Ms. Thompson’s supplemental affidavit, is             
          shown in Mr. Caylor’s affidavit as having a date of Feb. 26,                
          1996.                                                                       





Page:  Previous  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011