Crystal K. Abeyta and Ron L. Abeyta - Page 3

                                        - 2 -                                         
          be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion           
          should not be cited as authority.                                           
               Respondent determined a deficiency in petitioners’ Federal             
          income tax for the taxable year 2000 of $6,826 and an accuracy-             
          related penalty under section 6662(a) of $1,365.                            
               After petitioners’ concession,2 the issues for decision are:           
               (1)  Whether petitioners are entitled under section 119 to             
          exclude from gross income the value of lodging furnished to                 
          petitioner Ron L. Abeyta (Mr. Abeyta).  We hold that they are               
          not.                                                                        
               (2)  Whether petitioners are liable for self-employment tax            
          on the value of lodging furnished to Mr. Abeyta.  We hold that              
          they are not.                                                               
               (3)  Whether petitioners are liable under section 6662(a)              
          for an accuracy-related penalty.  We hold that they are not.                
               An adjustment to the amount of petitioners’ itemized                   
          deductions is purely a computational matter, the resolution of              
          which is dependent on our disposition of the disputed issues.               
                                     Background                                       
               Some of the facts have been stipulated, and they are so                
          found.  We incorporate by reference the parties’ stipulation of             
          facts and accompanying exhibits.                                            


               2  Petitioners concede that they are not entitled to claim a           
          cost-of-living allowance exclusion under sec. 912.                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011