Crystal K. Abeyta and Ron L. Abeyta - Page 14

                                       - 13 -                                         
               The record is clear, and respondent does not dispute, that             
          Mr. Abeyta was an employee of TRW during the taxable year 2000.6            
          As stated earlier, all personnel working at the base were                   
          required to accept lodging in Alice Springs, and that evidently             
          included employees of contractors working at the base.  Although            
          it is not entirely clear from the record the manner in which TRW            
          accounted to the Department of the Air Force for housing provided           
          to TRW employees, it is plausible to infer that TRW arranged for            
          petitioners’ lodging as part of TRW’s status as a contractor at             
          the base.7  As a condition of his employment to work at the                 
          JDSRF/JDSCS, Mr. Abeyta was required to accept the lodging                  
          provided by TRW in Alice Springs.  The nature of TRW’s status as            
          a contractor at the base as well as the conditions prerequisite             
          to Mr. Abeyta’s employment at the base do not rise to the level             

               6  The essence of respondent’s argument is that the value of           
          the lodging escaped the FICA and Medicare taxes.  Respondent’s              
          argument appears premised on a finding that Mr. Abeyta was                  
          somehow an independent contractor such that the lodging would be            
          subject to the self-employment tax.  See Jackson v. Commissioner,           
          108 T.C. 130, 133-134 (1997) (earnings derived from work as an              
          independent contractor are self-employment income subject to the            
          self-employment tax).  The evidence, however, is to the contrary.           
          See secs. 3101, 3121(d)(2); see also Profl. & Executive Leasing,            
          Inc. v. Commissioner, 89 T.C. 225, 232 (1987) (listing seven                
          factors considered in determining whether an individual is an               
          employee or an independent contractor), affd. 862 F.2d 751 (9th             
          Cir. 1988).                                                                 
               7  With respect to the lodging, the statutory notice of                
          deficiency states that Mr. Abeyta “is an employee of a defense              
          contractor in Alice Springs, Australia, and is furnished housing            
          by the US Air Force as part of the contract that the US                     
          Government has with the contractor.”                                        





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011