- 2 - be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion should not be cited as authority. Respondent determined a deficiency in petitioners’ Federal income tax for the taxable year 2001 of $5,101 and an accuracy- related penalty under section 6662(a) of $1,020. After dismissal of petitioner Judith M. De Shon2 and after concessions,3 the issues for decision are: (1) Whether petitioners received unreported discharge of indebtedness income of $12,253 in taxable year 2001. We hold that they did to the extent provided herein. (2) Whether petitioners are liable under section 6662(a) for an accuracy-related penalty. We hold that they are not. 2 Petitioner Judith M. De Shon (Mrs. De Shon) did not appear at trial and did not execute the stipulation of facts. Petitioner Michael J. De Shon (Mr. De Shon) is not admitted to practice before this Court and is therefore not authorized to represent Mrs. De Shon in this Court notwithstanding a purported durable power of attorney. See Rules 24, 200. Accordingly, the Court will dismiss this action as to Mrs. De Shon. Rule 123(b). Decision, however, will be entered against Mrs. De Shon consistent with the decision entered against Mr. De Shon as to the deficiency and the accuracy-related penalty. 3 Respondent concedes that petitioners did not receive Social Security benefits of $246. Petitioners concede that they received: (1) Social Security benefits of $6, (2) interest income of $58 from Catholic Aid Association (Catholic Aid), (3) a taxable distribution of $6,611 from Catholic Knights Insurance Society, and (4) a taxable distribution of $3,001 from Catholic Aid.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011