Judith M. De Shon and Michael J. De Shon - Page 8

                                        - 7 -                                         
          for income tax.  Higbee v. Commissioner, 116 T.C. 438, 442                  
          (2001).                                                                     
               Gross income includes all income from whatever source                  
          derived, including but not limited to discharge of indebtedness.            
          Sec. 61(a)(12); sec. 1.61-12(a), Income Tax Regs.  A discharge of           
          indebtedness generally produces income in an amount equal to the            
          difference between the amount due on the obligation and the                 
          amount paid for the discharge.  See Babin v. Commissioner, 23               
          F.3d 1032, 1034 (6th Cir. 1994), affg. T.C. Memo. 1992-673.  As             
          explained by the United States Supreme Court, the general theory            
          is that to the extent that a taxpayer has been released from                
          indebtedness, the taxpayer has realized an accession to income              
          because the cancellation of indebtedness effects a freeing of               
          assets previously offset by the liability arising from such                 
          indebtedness.  United States v. Kirby Lumber Co., 284 U.S. 1, 3             
          (1931); see Cozzi v. Commissioner, 88 T.C. 435, 445 (1987).                 
               Debt is deemed discharged the moment it becomes clear that             
          the debt will never have to be paid.  Cozzi v. Commissioner,                
          supra at 445.  The test for determining when this moment occurs             
          requires an assessment of the facts and circumstances surrounding           
          the likelihood of repayment.  Id.  “Any ‘identifiable event’                
          which fixes the loss with certainty may be taken into                       
          consideration.”  Id. (quoting United States v. S.S. White Dental            
          Manufacturing Co., 274 U.S. 398, 401 (1927)).                               






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011