Mary K. Dues - Page 4

                                        - 4 -                                         
               Petitioner4 did not file a petition in the Court with re-              
          spect to the notice relating to taxable years 1997 and 1998.                
               On February 5, 2001, respondent assessed petitioner’s tax,             
          as well as an accuracy-related penalty under section 6662(a) and            
          interest as provided by law, for each of the taxable years 1997             
          and 1998 (respondent’s assessment for each of the taxable years             
          1997 and 1998).  (We shall refer to any such unpaid assessed                
          amounts, as well as interest as provided by law accrued after               
          February 5, 2001, as petitioner’s respective unpaid liabilities             
          for 1997 and 1998.)                                                         
               On a date not disclosed by the record that was within 60               
          days after the date on which respondent made respondent’s assess-           
          ment for each of the taxable years 1997 and 1998, respondent                
          issued to petitioner a notice of balance due with respect to                
          petitioner’s respective unpaid liabilities for 1997 and 1998, as            
          required by section 6303(a).                                                
               On May 11, 2001, respondent issued to petitioner a final               
          notice of intent to levy and notice of your right to a hearing              
          (notice of intent to levy) with respect to taxable years 1997 and           
          1998.                                                                       
               On May 24, 2001, respondent issued to petitioner a notice of           
          Federal tax lien filing and your right to a hearing (notice of              

               4This case involves only petitioner, and not Mr. Dues.  For            
          convenience, we shall hereinafter refer only to petitioner, and             
          not to petitioner and Mr. Dues.                                             





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011