Mary K. Dues - Page 11

                                       - 11 -                                         
          groundless.  See Abrams v. Commissioner, 82 T.C. 403, 409-413               
          (1984); White v. Commissioner, 72 T.C. 1126, 1135-1136 (1979).              
               We have considered all of petitioner’s statements, conten-             
          tions, arguments, and requests that are not discussed herein,               
          and, to the extent we have not found them to be frivolous and/or            
          groundless, we find them to be without merit and/or irrelevant.             
               On the record before us, we shall grant respondent’s motion.           
               To reflect the foregoing,                                              


                                             An order granting respondent's           
                                        motion and an appropriate decision            
                                        will be entered.                              

























Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  

Last modified: May 25, 2011