-2- are asked to decide whether petitioner is entitled to deduct $158,381 as a business bad debt in 1998 under section 166 and whether the accuracy-related penalty under section 6662(a) should apply. We hold that petitioner is not entitled to deduct $158,381 as a business bad debt and that the accuracy-related penalty applies. FINDINGS OF FACT Some of the facts have been stipulated and are so found. The stipulation of facts and the accompanying exhibits are incorporated by this reference. Petitioner resided in Anoka, Minnesota, at the time he filed the petition in this case. Petitioner has owned and operated Egan Oil, a sole proprietorship, for 43 years. Egan Oil is a distributor of Exxon Mobil petroleum products. Egan Oil purchases petroleum products from Exxon Mobil and then resells them to customers such as service stations and convenience stores. One of Egan Oil’s customers was Brooks Foods, Inc. (Brooks Foods), a chain of food stores owned by a prominent local businessman named Brooks Hauser. Mr. Hauser encountered business difficulties in 1993 and 1994 and fell behind on his payments to Egan Oil for petroleum products Brooks Foods had purchased. Petitioner knew Mr. Hauser was attempting to rebuild his business and was seeking to refinance. To protect himself from the rapidly increasing balance, petitioner decided to allow only a 2(...continued) petitioner’s net farm loss and respondent’s reduction of petitioner’s home mortgage interest deduction.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011