Estate of Webster E. Kelley, Deceased, John R. Louden and Patricia L. Louden, Personal Representatives - Page 3

                                        - 3 -                                         
          interests of 94.83 percent in KLLP and of 33.33 percent in KLBP             
          LLC.                                                                        
               On decedent’s date of death, KLLP held assets totaling                 
          $1,226,421, which consisted of $807,271 cash and $419,150 in                
          certificates of deposit, and had no liabilities.                            
               In December 1999, the estate employed Appraisal                        
          Technologies, Inc. (ATI), to prepare a valuation of decedent’s              
          interests in these closely held entities.  ATI concluded that a             
          53.5-percent valuation discount was applicable.1                            
               On September 1, 2000, the estate filed a Form 706, United              
          States Estate (and Generation-Skipping Transfer) Tax Return,                
          reporting decedent’s 94.83-percent interest in KLLP at a value of           
          $521,565 and his interest in KLBP LLC at a value of $1,833.33.              
               Respondent issued a notice of deficiency determining that              
          the discounts claimed by the estate were too high and lower                 
          discounts were appropriate.2  Respondent contends that the estate           
          is entitled to a 25.2-percent discount.                                     





               1  The estate states several times on brief that ATI used a            
          55.15-percent discount; however, in calculating the discounts               
          applied by the estate, we find that ATI used a 53.5-percent                 
          discount.                                                                   
               2  The statutory notice of deficiency sets forth numerous              
          alternative arguments including arguments based on secs. 2035,              
          2036, 2038, and 2703.  At trial, respondent conceded all the                
          alternative arguments.                                                      




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011