- 10 -
her share of the group fees had been reasonably allocated to her,
but she did not include any supporting information or
documentation to establish the nature of the work performed, the
hourly rates used, the identity of the person who performed the
work, the number of hours billed for the work, the number of Hoyt
investor clients who shared in the group fees, or the manner in
which the group fees were allocated to petitioner and to the
other Hoyt investor clients of petitioner’s attorneys.
On August 4, 2004, we filed respondent’s response to
petitioner’s motion, in which respondent objected to an award of
costs. Petitioner requested and was granted leave to file a
reply to respondent’s response to the motion. On September 15,
2004, we filed petitioner’s reply to respondent’s response, which
included a supplemental declaration but did not provide any
detailed information regarding her counsel’s billing and
allocation arrangements with respect to the group fees. On
December 6, 2004, we ordered petitioner to submit, on or before
January 7, 2005, an additional affidavit with supporting
documentation to support her contention that the group fees were
reasonable and had been reasonably allocated and that her share
of the group fees was incurred in connection with this matter.
In the December 6, 2004, order, we also authorized respondent to
submit a supplemental response addressing the information
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011