Patrick Carlin Hickey, et al. - Page 10

                                        -10-                                          
          investigate further to determine whether the recording of the               
          house and vehicles in names other than petitioner was in fact               
          proper.  Cox also was awaiting receipt of additional financial              
          information that petitioner had told him would be forthcoming.              
          Cox was not sure at this time that he would refer petitioner to             
          CID but thought that he should discuss with CID his belief that             
          petitioner’s case was a potential fraud case.  Cox had a                    
          suspicion at the time that petitioner was not being truthful with           
          him.                                                                        
               On November 7, 1994, petitioner met with Cox again and gave            
          him more financial information.  Petitioner informed Cox at this            
          meeting that petitioner’s 1994 income to date was $22,180, rather           
          than $29,000 as previously reported.  Petitioner also changed               
          certain line items that he had previously reported on the                   
          financial statements.  Petitioner and Cox had no further meetings           
          after this date.                                                            
               On January 3, 1995, petitioner filed for bankruptcy under              
          chapter 7 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code.  On the same day, Cox                
          received a copy of that filing.                                             
               On or about February 8, 1995, Cox attempted to contact                 
          petitioner’s daughter but was unable to do so.  On February 8,              
          1995, Cox spoke to petitioner’s ex-wife as to the house in which            
          petitioner lived and the fact that it was listed in the name of             
          the daughter.  Petitioner’s ex-wife informed Cox that she did not           






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011