- 3 - FINDINGS OF FACT Petitioner resided in Arizona when he filed his petition. He previously petitioned this Court in cases decided at Howard v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1998-57 (Howard I); Howard v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1998-300 (Howard II); Howard v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2000-222 (Howard III); Howard v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2002-85 (Howard IV); and Howard v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2005-100 (Howard V). Petitioner’s positions in the previous cases were frivolous and groundless. In Howard III, Howard IV, and Howard V, we awarded penalties to the United States under section 6673. Family Life Broadcasting System employed petitioner in 2000 and 2002, paid wages to him by check, and issued to him Forms W- 2, Wage and Tax Statement. He received wage income of $36,899 in 2000 and $39,460 in 2002 and Social Security benefits of $14,840 in 2002. He had $1,357 withheld for Federal income tax in 2000, and $1,176 withheld in 2002. Petitioner received from his investments with a fund managed by the Phoenix Investment Partners, Ltd., dividends in 2000 of $830.31 and in 2002 of $701.45, of which $210 was withheld for Federal income tax, and capital gain income in 2000 of $1,054.69, of which $584 was withheld for Federal income tax. Petitioner also received interest in 2000 of $74, of which $22 tax was withheld, and in 2002 of $196, of which $17 tax was withheld.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011