- 20 - the corporation” as that phrase is used in section 1.302-4(d), Income Tax Regs.) was realistically contingent upon HMI’s con- tinued financial health. The buyers likewise had a motivation to structure the transaction as they did--their inability to obtain traditional financing without unduly burdening HMI’s potential for normal business operations. Even one of the IRS witnesses showed this understanding of Mr. Hurst’s relationship to the new owners after the redemption--the revenue agent who conducted the audit accurately testified that Mr. Hurst was “going to be the banker and wanted his interests protected.” The number of legal connections between Mr. Hurst and the buyers that continued after the deal was signed did not change their character as permissible security interests. Even looked at all together, they were in no way contingent upon the finan- cial performance of the company except in the obvious sense that all creditors have in their debtors’ solvency. Moreover, despite the Commissioner’s qualms, we find as a matter of fact that Mr. Hurst has not participated in any manner in any corporate activity since the redemptions occurred--not even a Christmas party or summer picnic. His only dealing with HMI after the sale was when, as noted above, he dickered with the buyers over their purchase option on the Safety Drive property. These facts do not show a continuing proprietary stake or control of corporate management.Page: Previous 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011