- 22 - B. Independence of Mercury Solar PTO Trustees When Mercury Solar PTO was purportedly created in 1994, someone named J. Clark Atkinson (Atkinson) was named “Fiduciary Owner”. On the same day, Atkinson appointed Sparkman as “Agent” to “operate the company to the same extent as if he were the owner.” In 1998, Atkinson appointed Porter as “Trustee” (notwithstanding that Mercury Solar PTO’s formation documents make no provision for any “trustee”, but only for “Fiduciary Owners”) and resigned shortly thereafter as “Fiduciary Owner” (thereby leaving Mercury Solar PTO with no “Fiduciary Owner”). On the basis of the evidence in the record, we are not persuaded that either Atkinson or Porter served any independent role in Mercury Solar PTO as “Fiduciary Owner” or “trustee”.23 The evidence does not show that Atkinson ever did anything, except possibly sign some documents. We draw an adverse inference from petitioners’ failure to call Atkinson as a witness. Porter’s testimony, on the other hand, convinced us that she had no meaningful role at Mercury Solar PTO but was merely an absentee 23 Similarly, there is no indication in the record that the trustees or “Fiduciary Owners” of HEH, apart from Sparkman, had any meaningful role in that purported entity. On Aug. 10, 1994, when Mercury Solar PTO was purportedly created, the trustees of HEH were Lee Allan Hansen and Porter. There is no indication in the record of what duties, if any, Lee Allan Hansen performed with respect to HEH other than signing some organizational documents. Nor is there any indication that Porter had any significant duties as purported trustee of HEH. To the contrary, her testimony evinced no meaningful knowledge of HEH operations.Page: Previous 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011