Estate of Timothy J. Tehan, Deceased, Timothy R. Tehan, Executor - Page 19

                                       - 19 -                                         
          to pay any rent,14 let alone fair rental value, for his posses-             
          sion and enjoyment of decedent’s residence.15                               
               Based upon our examination of the entire record before us,             
          we find that decedent retained a life estate in decedent’s                  
          residence during the period November 5, 1997, until the date of             
          his death.  On that record, we further find that decedent re-               
          tained possession and enjoyment of decedent’s residence within              
          the meaning of section 2036(a)(1).  On the record before us, we             
          find that the value of decedent’s residence is includible in                
          decedent’s gross estate under that section.16                               
          Section 2053                                                                
               The estate has the burden of establishing its entitlement to           
          deduct under section 2053 the claimed personal representative’s             



               14Indeed, the November 5, 1997 agreement provides that                 
          decedent “shall not pay any rent” while occupying decedent’s                
          residence.                                                                  
               15Despite the purported decrease in decedent’s ownership               
          interest in decedent’s residence under the first deed, the second           
          deed, and the third deed, decedent paid all of the monthly                  
          expenses with respect to that residence.                                    
               16For the first time on brief, the estate advances an alter-           
          native argument that “if inclusion [of decedent’s residence] in             
          the taxable estate were to be based upon the decedent’s remaining           
          in the property for six weeks when he had no contractual right to           
          do so, it should be limited to the 28% interest conveyed in                 
          1999.”  On the record before us, we reject the estate’s alterna-            
          tive argument.  In finding that decedent retained possession and            
          enjoyment of decedent’s residence within the meaning of sec.                
          2036(a)(1), we have not relied only on decedent’s remaining in              
          that residence during the period starting on the date on which              
          the third deed was executed until the date of his death.                    




Page:  Previous  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011