Tribune Company, As Agent of and Successor By Merger to the Former the Times Mirror Company, Itself and its Consolidated Subsidiaries - Page 47

                                       - 133 -                                        
               The freedom to arrange one’s affairs to minimize taxes                 
               does not include the right to engage in financial                      
               fantasies with the expectation that the Internal                       
               Revenue Service and the courts will play along.  The                   
               Commissioner and the courts are empowered, and in fact                 
               duty-bound, to look beyond the contrived forms of                      
               transactions to their economic substance and to apply                  
               the tax laws accordingly.  That is what we have done in                
               this case and that is what taxpayers should expect in                  
               the future.  * * *  [Saviano v. Commissioner, 765 F.2d                 
               643, 654 (7th Cir. 1985), affg. 80 T.C. 955 (1983).]                   
               From any perspective, the “true economic effect”                       
          (petitioner’s words, quoted above) of the Bender transaction was            
          a sale.  Because the consideration paid by the buyer, to wit,               
          unfettered control over $1.375 billion in cash, passed to the               
          seller from the buyer, the Bender transaction does not qualify as           
          a reorganization under section 368(a)(1)(B), which requires that            
          the exchange be solely for stock.  Because the MB Parent common             
          stock lacked control over any assets, its value was negligible in           
          comparison to the $1.1 billion value that would be required to              
          qualify the Bender transaction as a tax-free reorganization under           
          section 368(a)(1)(A) and (a)(2)(E).                                         
          Evidentiary Matters                                                         
               The extensive stipulations of the parties included certain             
          documents to which objections were made with the understanding              
          that the objections would be discussed in the posttrial briefs.             
          Respondent objected on relevance, materiality, and hearsay                  
          grounds to four articles concerning the failed merger between               
          Reed and Wolters Kluwer.  Petitioner did not address these                  






Page:  Previous  116  117  118  119  120  121  122  123  124  125  126  127  128  129  130  131  132  133  134  135  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011