- 9 - or group of factors is determinative. Sec. 1.183-2(b), Income Tax Regs.; Golanty v. Commissioner, supra; Dunn v. Commissioner, 70 T.C. 715, 720 (1978), affd. 615 F.2d 578 (2d Cir. 1980). Petitioners contend that they entered into the special education activity with the expectation of making a profit. Respondent contends that petitioners did not have the requisite profit motive. To make our determination, we address the nine factors found in section 1.183-2(b), Income Tax Regs. 1. Manner in Which Petitioners Carried On the Special Education Activity The fact that the taxpayer carries on the activity in a businesslike manner and maintains complete and accurate books and records may indicate that the activity is engaged in for profit. Sec. 1.183-2(b)(1), Income Tax Regs.; Elliot v. Commissioner, 90 T.C. 960, 972 (1988); Engdahl v. Commissioner, 72 T.C. 659, 666 (1979). Petitioners introduced evidence of checks issued to teachers and testified that they were required to provide expense reports in order to receive funding from BUSD and Regional Center. Respondent concedes that petitioners kept adequate records. When the taxpayer conducts the activity in a manner substantially similar to other activities of the same nature which are profitable, a profit motive may be indicated. Sec. 1.183-2(b)(1), Income Tax Regs.; Engdahl v. Commissioner, supra.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011