Peter K. Chow - Page 15

                                       - 14 -                                         
          by respondent as a tax shelter marketer.  Petitioner also                   
          responded that he accepted full responsibility for his failure to           
          timely file his return.  Petitioner also testified that although            
          he hired persons to trade stock futures for him, he did not hire            
          anyone to help prepare his taxes because ‘he didn’t really know             
          how much of an impact it would have.’                                       
               Petitioner’s delay in filing a timely tax return                       
          is not due to reasonable cause.  Petitioner failed to                       
          exercise ordinary care and willfully neglected to file his 2000             
          Federal tax return timely.  “As a general rule, taxpayers are               
          charged with knowledge of the law.”  Niedringhaus v.                        
          Commissioner, 99 T.C. 202, 222 (1992).  A taxpayer need not be an           
          expert in tax law to know that tax returns have fixed filing                
          dates.  United States v. Boyle, supra at 251.                               
               Petitioner’s 2000 Federal income tax return was due on April           
          15, 2001.  Petitioner filed his return on June 1, 2004, and                 
          offered no rational explanation for his failure to file the                 
          return timely.  Petitioner failed to show that he exercised                 
          ordinary care and prudence in this case.  Accordingly, petitioner           
          is liable for the addition to tax under section 6651(a)(1).                 
          Respondent is sustained on this issue.                                      
               b.  Section 6654(a)                                                    
               Respondent also determined that petitioner is liable for an            
          addition to tax for the underpayment of estimated tax pursuant to           






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011