- 35 - standard of section 1.263A-1(f)(4), Income Tax Regs., governs the first level allocation in the present case. Specifically, respondent states: As a preface to Treas. Reg. �1.263A-1(g), paragraph (f)(1) states that paragraph (g) provides general rules of applying paragraph (f)’s detailed allocation methods. In the general rule applicable to this case, Treas. Reg. � 1.263A-1(g)(3) provides that Common Costs are generally to be first allocated to “intermediate cost objectives.” The regulation uses “activities” to illustrate what is meant by intermediate cost objectives. Thus, it intends that the phrase “intermediate cost objectives” refers to the first level of cost allocation referenced above, i.e., between � 263A activities and other activities. Treas. Reg. � 1.263A-1(c). Treas. Reg. � 1.263A-1(g)(3) further states that this allocation of Common Costs at the intermediate level, or first level of allocation between section 263A and non-263A activities, is to be allocated using * * * any other reasonable allocation method as defined under paragraph (f)(4). Respondent’s argument is premised on the notion that section 1.263A-1(g)(3), Income Tax Regs., governs Qwest’s first level allocations between its customer contracts and its retained assets. However, respondent’s interpretation of section 1.263A- 1(g)(3), Income Tax Regs., is not supported by the language of sections 1.263A-1(f)(1), (g)(1) and (2), Income Tax Regs. In pertinent part, section 1.263A-1(f)(1), Income Tax Regs., provides: “The language of paragraph (f) sets forth various detailed * * * cost allocation methods * * * [used] to allocate direct and indirect costs to property produced and property acquired for resale.” This language explicitly limits the cost allocation methods of section 1.263A-1(f), Income Tax Regs., toPage: Previous 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011