Anschutz Company and Subsidiaries - Page 38

                                       - 38 -                                         
          trying to establish a reasonableness standard for the first level           
          allocation, respondent collapses the two levels of allocation               
          into one.                                                                   
               As discussed above, the regulations under both sections 263A           
          and 451 provide for two levels of allocations.  At the first                
          level, section 1.263A-1(e)(3)(i), Income Tax Regs., provides that           
          “Taxpayers subject to section 263A must make a reasonable                   
          allocation of indirect costs between production, resale, and                
          other activities.”  Likewise, section 1.451-3(d)(6)(ii), Income             
          Tax Regs., “[requires] a reasonable allocation between the                  
          portion of such costs that are attributable to * * * long-term              
          contracts and the portion attributable to the other activities of           
          the taxpayer.”  “Reasonable allocation” is not defined in either            
          section.  See secs. 1.263A-1(e)(3)(i), 1.451-3(d)(6)(ii), Income            
          Tax Regs.                                                                   
               With respect to the second level allocation, section 1.263A-           
          1(g)(3), Income Tax Regs., provides that the indirect costs of              
          property produced or property acquired for resale be “allocated             
          using either a specific identification method, a standard cost              
          method, a burden rate method, or any other reasonable allocation            
          method (as defined under the principles of paragraph (f)(4) of              
          this section).”  In relevant part, section 1.263A-1(f)(4), Income           
          Tax Regs., states:  “a taxpayer may use any other reasonable                
          method to properly allocate direct and indirect costs among units           






Page:  Previous  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011