Charles Leonard Braden and Joice Stieber Braden - Page 18

                                       - 17 -                                         
             claims and the only reference in the record to specific                  
             claims is found in the section of the notice of class                    
             action entitled “Release”.  That section states, in part,                
             as follows:                                                              

                  If the Court approves the proposed settlement,                      
                  and if you are a class member who did not timely                    
                  and properly request exclusion from the class,                      
                  you will release (give up) all claims against                       
                  State Farm, its parents, predecessors, and                          
                  subsidiaries that have been or could have been                      
                  asserted in this lawsuit, and all claims known                      
                  or unknown arising from the allegations of the                      
                  complaint as described in the Settlement                            
                  Agreement on file with the Court.                                   

             As mentioned above, the settlement agreement is not in the               
             record of this case.  Nevertheless, respondent argues that               
             the above language “cannot, as a matter of law, include                  
             the petitioner’s statute-barred tort claims from 1983.”                  
             We also note that the release that petitioner may have                   
             signed is not in the record of this case.                                
                  Furthermore, respondent argues, “the absence of any                 
             settlement allocation between specific claims, would still               
             render the entire damage award taxable.”  In support of                  
             that argument, respondent cites Taggi v. United States,                  
             835 F. Supp. 744, 746 (S.D. N.Y. 1993), affd. 35 F.3d 93                 
             (2d Cir. 1994), and Morabito v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo.                 
             1997-315.  In both cases, the taxpayer had accepted a                    
             payment in connection with the termination of his                        





Page:  Previous  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011