Timothy J. Coburn - Page 20

                                       - 20 -                                         
               Respondent disputes the award of costs for certain                     
          disbursements that respondent contends petitioner did not                   
          adequately describe.  Rule 231 provides that a party claiming               
          litigation costs for which the parties have not reached an                  
          agreement must file a written motion that includes a statement of           
          the specific litigation costs claimed and a supporting affidavit            
          setting forth the nature and amount of each item.  Rule                     
          231(a)(2), (b), (d).  Petitioner timely filed a motion with this            
          Court in compliance with Rule 231.  With the motion, petitioner             
          filed the supporting affidavit of his attorney Richard A. Siegal            
          and a detailed billing record (the billing record) identifying              
          each “out-of-pocket disbursement” billed to petitioner with                 
          respect to the instant proceedings.14  The billing record                   
          chronologically sets forth the date and amount of each                      
          disbursement and identifies each disbursement with a numeric                
          code.  The billing record separately describes each numeric code.           
          For instance, the billing record sets forth a disbursement of               
          $461.66 on February 8, 2005, and identifies the disbursement with           
          the numeric code “00256”.  Separately, the billing record                   
          describes the numeric code “00256” as “Lexis Research”.15  On the           

               14Petitioner also filed an additional affidavit in                     
          compliance with Rule 232(d).                                                
               15As noted above, respondent generally contends that                   
          petitioner’s descriptions of the claimed costs were inadequate.             
          With respect to this example, respondent contended that                     
                                                             (continued...)           





Page:  Previous  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011