- 3 -
b. Minns Hours Relating to Dispute With
Committee ................ 50
c. Additional Porter & Hedges Time Relating
to Minns Dispute ............ 50
d. Porter & Hedges Time Relating to
Bill of Costs .............. 51
e. Porter & Hedges Time Relating to Remand . 51
3. Adjustments to Porter & Hedges Time
Relating to Fee Request ........... 51
a. Initial Research Time .......... 51
b. Time Relating to Unsuccessful Claims .. 52
D. Computation of Potentially Compensable Fees .... 55
1. The Hongsermeiers--Work on the Appeal .... 55
a. 2001 .................. 55
b. 2002 .................. 56
c. Total .................. 57
2. The Hongsermeiers--Work on the Fee Request 57
a. 2003 to 2005 .............. 57
b. 2006 .................. 57
c. Application of Limited Success Factor .. 57
3. The PH Petitioners .............. 59
a. 2001 .................. 59
b. 2002 to 2005 .............. 60
c. 2006 .................. 61
d. Total .................. 61
E. Potentially Compensable Expenses ......... 62
F. Amounts Paid or Incurred by Eligible Persons ... 62
1. Amounts Paid Through the Defense Fund .... 63
a. Minns Agreement ............. 63
b. Porter & Hedges Agreement ........ 66
2. Amounts Paid Directly to Minns ....... 68
3. Amounts Incurred But Not Paid ........ 68
4. Summary ................... 69
G. Final Figures ................... 69
IV. Interest ........................ 70
Appendix A--September 1, 2005 Order ............. 72
Appendix B--September 8, 2005 Order ............. 78
Appendix C--November 18, 2005 Order ............. 84
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BEGHE, Judge: These cases are before the Court on separate
remand from the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. In this
opinion, we address petitioners’ requests for appellate
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011