Jerry and Patricia A. Dixon, et al. - Page 6

                                        - 6 -                                         
          shelter programs (the Kersting project) promoted by Henry F.K.              
          Kersting (Kersting).  Respondent’s determinations resulted in the           
          commencement in this Court of more than 1,800 cases arising from            
          the disallowance of deductions claimed by participants in the               
          Kersting programs.  Most such participants who filed petitions in           
          this Court signed “piggyback agreements” with respondent,                   
          agreeing to be bound by the outcome of test cases that had been             
          selected by respondent’s trial attorney and Brian Seery (Seery),            
          the attorney originally retained by Kersting to provide                     
          representation in the Tax Court to participants in his programs.            
               Following Seery’s withdrawal, Kersting engaged Robert J.               
          Chicoine (Chicoine) and Darrell D. Hallett (Hallett) to represent           
          the participants in his programs in the Tax Court.  Some such               
          participants, including the Thompsons (who were test case                   
          petitioners), separately retained Luis C. DeCastro (DeCastro) to            
          represent them in the Tax Court.                                            
               DeCastro obtained 20-percent reduction settlements on behalf           
          of some of the Kersting project participants he represented, as             
          did Chicoine and Hallett on behalf of other nontest case                    
          petitioners.  Chicoine and Hallett disclosed the 20-percent                 
          reduction settlement to the test case and nontest case                      
          petitioners who had inquired about the possibility of a more                
          advantageous settlement than the 7-percent reduction project                
          settlement respondent had been offering.                                    






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011