- 17 - Court is not in accordance with law, to modify or to reverse the decision of the Tax Court, with or without remanding the case for a rehearing, as justice may require.” Sec. 7482(c)(1). Generally, perfection of an appeal of a decision or certification transfers jurisdiction of the case to the Court of Appeals; i.e., the jurisdiction of the trial court ceases and that of the Court of Appeals begins. Griggs v. Provident Consumer Disc. Co., 459 U.S. 56, 58 (1982). Once an appeal is commenced, the trial court generally does not have authority to act upon matters relating to the subject matter of the appeal until the mandate from the appellate court is returned.10 Hunter Douglas Corp. v. Lando Prods., Inc., 235 F.2d 631, 632-633 (9th Cir. 1956); Pollei v. Commissioner, 94 T.C. 595, 600 (1990). Once an appellate court returns its mandate, jurisdiction over the case revests in the trial court. United States v. Cote, 51 F.3d 178, 182 (9th Cir. 1995). Under the law of the case doctrine and the rule of mandate, the trial court’s authority to address any issues after an appeal is completed is generally 10There are limited exceptions to this general rule. Even though an appeal of a judgment is pending in the Court of Appeals, “the lower court may retain jurisdiction over certain matters, without appellate court approval or sanction,” e.g., matters that are “collateral to the appeal, in aid of the appeal, to correct clerical mistakes, in aid of execution of a judgment that has not been superseded, and to maintain the status quo between the parties pending the appeal.” Pollei v. Commissioner, 94 T.C. 595, 600 (1990).Page: Previous 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011