Jerry and Patricia A. Dixon, et al. - Page 15

                                       - 15 -                                         
          production of the more than 200 documents and items encompassed             
          by respondent’s privilege log, as being relevant to that purpose.           
               In Dixon VI, we held that:  (1) The final Thompson                     
          settlement is to be regarded as resulting in a 63.37-percent                
          reduction of the Thompsons’ deficiencies, as well as elimination            
          of all Kersting-related penalties and additions; (2) the Thompson           
          settlement encompasses and requires the vacating of the portion             
          or portions of the deficiencies determined against any                      
          petitioners that may be attributable to the “Bauspar” shelter               
          that was also promoted by Kersting; (3) the Thompson settlement’s           
          cancellation of the Thompsons’ 1981 late-filing addition                    
          justifies cancellation of not only all non-Kersting-related                 
          penalties and additions but also all other substantive                      
          adjustments not arising from shelters promoted by Kersting; (4)             
          interest on the reduced deficiencies shall not be charged beyond            
          the date in June 1992 fixed by respondent’s concession and shall            
          not be stopped as of any earlier date, such as December 1986,               
          which petitioners contend marked the inception of the fraud on              
          the court.                                                                  





               9(...continued)                                                        
          entered in response to respondent’s project settlement offer of             
          January 1993 and other settlements of Kersting project cases.               
          See supra note 4.                                                           





Page:  Previous  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011