Estate of Burton W. Kanter, Deceased, Joshua S. Kanter, Independent Administrator - Page 4

                                        - 4 -                                         
          for the Seventh Circuit seeking review of some (but not all) of             
          the issues decided by this Court in respondent’s favor.  In                 
          Estate of Kanter v. Commissioner, 337 F.3d 833, 839 (7th Cir.               
          2003), the Court of Appeals listed the issues subject to review             
          as follows:  (1) Additions to tax for fraud, (2) adjustments                
          related to the Bea Ritch Trusts, (3) disallowed deductions for              
          activities related to a painting of George Washington, (4)                  
          unreported income for 1982 based on a bank deposits analysis, (5)           
          unreported income from Equitable Leasing transactions, and (6)              
          unreported income from a transaction related to a shelf                     
          corporation identified as Cashmere.  The Kanters also appealed              
          the Court’s denial of their motions to make the Couvillion report           
          part of the record in their cases, and Naomi R. Kanter appealed             
          issues related to her claims for relief under section 6015.  At             
          the same time, Ballard appealed his cases to the Court of Appeals           
          for the Eleventh Circuit, and the Estate of Lisle appealed its              
          cases to the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.                        
               In Ballard v. Commissioner, 321 F.3d 1037 (11th Cir. 2003),            
          the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit affirmed this                 
          Court’s holdings as to Ballard in all respects.                             
               In Estate of Kanter v. Commissioner, supra, the Court of               
          Appeals for the Seventh Circuit affirmed in part and reversed in            
          part.  The Court of Appeals affirmed this Court’s holdings                  
          denying release of the Couvillion report.  The Court of Appeals             






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011