Estate of Burton W. Kanter, Deceased, Joshua S. Kanter, Independent Administrator - Page 10

                                       - 10 -                                         
          petition was filed in this case, respondent filed additional                
          liens in Illinois and Florida against certain trusts alleged to             
          be alter egos of the estate and/or Naomi R. Kanter.8                        
                                     Discussion                                       
               Section 6321 imposes a lien in favor of the United States on           
          all property and rights to property of a person liable for tax              
          when a demand for the payment of the person’s taxes has been made           
          and the person fails to pay those taxes.  Such a lien arises when           
          an assessment is made.  Sec. 6322.  Section 6323(a) requires the            
          Secretary to file a notice of Federal tax lien if the lien is to            
          be valid against any purchaser, holder of a security interest,              
          mechanic’s lienor, or judgment lien creditor.  Lindsay v.                   
          Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2001-285, affd. 56 Fed. Appx. 800 (9th             
          Cir. 2003).  From the taxpayer’s perspective, the filing of such            
          a lien may have the negative effects of creating a cloud on the             
          taxpayer’s title to property and impairing the taxpayer’s                   
          creditworthiness.  See, e.g., Magana v. Commissioner, 118 T.C.              
          488 (2002).                                                                 




               8  We note that the notice of determination in dispute was             
          issued solely to the Estate of Burton W. Kanter and the petition            
          in this case is captioned solely in the name of the Estate of               
          Burton W. Kanter.  It is not clear that the estate’s counsel has            
          authority to represent Naomi R. Kanter as to collection matters.            
          Under the circumstances, any collection activities that                     
          respondent has initiated solely against Naomi R. Kanter do not              
          appear to be relevant to this proceeding.                                   





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011