- 8 - alerted to the possibility of a substantial understatement.” Flynn v. Commissioner, 93 T.C. 355, 365 (1989). Petitioner’s educational and business backgrounds were not made part of the record; nonetheless, the Court is not convinced that her failure to inquire was reasonable. She and her former spouse signed the return, and Mr. Lathrop’s unreported items of income were more than one-half of the taxable income they received that year.5 Even a cursory review of the return would have revealed that Mr. Lathrop completely omitted the nonemployee compensation he received, causing a substantial portion of their taxable income to be unreported. For the reasons discussed above, petitioner is not entitled to relief under section 6015(b). Section 6015(c) affords proportionate relief to the requesting spouse through allocation of the tax items to the responsible party. Generally, this avenue of relief allows a spouse to elect to be treated as if a separate return had been filed. Rowe v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2001-325. To be eligible for relief under section 6015(c), the requesting spouse must be no longer married to, be legally separated from, or have lived at least 12 months apart from the individual with whom the 5Petitioner and Mr. Lathrop reported $11,949 of taxable income for 2000. They should have reported $24,544 of taxable income ($3,999 of unemployment compensation plus $9,250 of nonemployee compensation less a $654 self-employment tax deduction).Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011