Debra Kay Forister - Page 10

                                        - 9 -                                         
          tax return was filed.  Sec. 6015(c)(3)(A)(i).  Relief under                 
          section 6015(c) is not available, however, to a taxpayer if it is           
          shown that the taxpayer had actual knowledge when signing the               
          return of any “item” giving rise to a deficiency.  Sec.                     
          6015(c)(3)(C).                                                              
               As previously discussed, petitioner is divorced from Mr.               
          Lathrop, and the divorce was finalized before she requested                 
          relief from joint and several liability.                                    
               However, as noted above, petitioner not only had reason to             
          know of the understatement at the time the return was signed, but           
          she also had actual knowledge of the items giving rise to the               
          deficiency.  Because petitioner had actual knowledge of these               
          items of income, she is precluded from claiming relief under                
          section 6015(c).                                                            
               Petitioner may be considered for relief under section                  
          6015(f) where there is an unpaid tax or deficiency for which she            
          is not eligible for relief under section 6015(b) or (c).  Sec.              
          6015(f)(2).  Section 6015(f)(1) provides that a taxpayer may be             
          relieved from joint and several liability if it is determined,              
          after considering all the facts and circumstances, that it is               
          inequitable to hold the taxpayer liable for the unpaid tax or               
          deficiency.  This Court reviews the Commissioner’s denial of                
          relief pursuant to section 6015(f) under an abuse of discretion             
          standard.  Butler v. Commissioner, 114 T.C. at 287-292.  The                






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011