Debra Kay Forister - Page 11

                                       - 10 -                                         
          Court defers to respondent’s determination unless it is                     
          arbitrary, capricious, or without sound basis in fact.  Jonson v.           
          Commissioner, 118 T.C. 106, 125 (2002), affd. 353 F.3d 1181 (10th           
          Cir. 2003).  Petitioner bears the burden of proving that there              
          was an abuse of discretion.  Abelein v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo.            
          2004-274.                                                                   
               The Commissioner has prescribed guidelines that are                    
          considered in determining whether it is inequitable to hold a               
          requesting spouse liable for all or part of the liability for any           
          unpaid tax or deficiency.  Rev. Proc. 2000-15,6 sec. 4.01, 2000-1           
          C.B. 447, 448, sets forth seven threshold conditions that the               
          requesting spouse must satisfy before the Commissioner will                 
          consider a request for relief under section 6015(f).  Respondent            
          agrees that petitioner has satisfied those threshold conditions.            
               Where, as here, the requesting spouse satisfies the                    
          threshold conditions, Rev. Proc. 2000-15, sec. 4.02, 2000-1 C.B.            
          447, 448, lists factors to be considered in determining whether             
          to grant equitable relief for underpayments of tax.  Equitable              
          relief under section 6015(f) for an underpayment of tax on a                

               6Rev. Proc. 2003-61, 2003-2 C.B. 296, which supersedes Rev.            
          Proc. 2000-15, 2000-1 C.B. 447, is effective for requests for               
          relief filed on or after Nov. 1, 2003, or requests for relief               
          pending on Nov. 1, 2003, for which no preliminary determination             
          letter has been issued as of that date.  Petitioner’s request for           
          relief was submitted on July 7, 2003, and a preliminary                     
          determination letter was issued on Oct. 3, 2003.  Accordingly,              
          the guidelines found in Rev. Proc. 2000-15, supra, are applicable           
          in this case.                                                               





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011