Elizabeth Giles - Page 34

                                       - 34 -                                         
               4.   Expectation That Assets Used in the Activity May                  
                    Appreciate in Value                                               
               The expectation that assets used in the activity will                  
          appreciate in value sufficiently to lead to an overall profit               
          when netted against losses may indicate a profit motive.                    
          Engdahl v. Commissioner, 72 T.C. at 668-669; Lapinel v.                     
          Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1989-685, affd. 930 F.2d 911 (2d Cir.              
          1991); sec. 1.183-2(b)(4), Income Tax Regs.  Petitioner argues              
          that the appreciation of Falling Water Way and Gavilan Hills,               
          combined with the value of her horses, is significant enough to             
          offset all prior losses.                                                    
                    a.   Falling Water Way and Gavilan Hills                          
               Petitioner asserts that Falling Water Way and Gavilan Hills            
          are held in connection with her horse activity.  Respondent, on             
          the other hand, argues that her holding of real property is an              
          activity separate from petitioner’s horse activity.  To make this           
          determination, section 1.183-1(d)(1), Income Tax Regs., states:             
               all facts and circumstances * * * must be taken into                   
               account.  Generally, the most significant facts and                    
               circumstances in making this determination are the                     
               degree of organizational and economic interrelationship                
               of various undertakings, the business purpose which is                 
               * * * served by carrying on the various undertakings                   
               separately or together * * * and the similarity of                     
               various undertakings. * * * The taxpayer’s                             
               characterization will not be accepted * * * when it                    
               appears that his characterization is artificial and                    
               cannot be reasonably supported under the facts and                     
               circumstances of the case.  If the taxpayer engages in                 
               two or more separate activities, deductions and income                 
               from each separate activity are not aggregated either                  






Page:  Previous  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011