Jesse and Tawara Goode - Page 4

                                         -4-                                          
          petitioner filed suit against the District with the United States           
          District Court for the District of Columbia, seeking damages and            
          declaratory and injunctive relief.  The gravamen of petitioner’s            
          complaint--comprised of two underlying counts alleging,                     
          respectively, the District’s infringement of petitioner’s First             
          Amendment rights under 42 U.S.C. sec. 1983 (2000) and violation             
          of the D.C. Whistleblower Reinforcement Act of 1998, D.C. Code              
          sec. 1-615.54--concerns the District’s averred retaliatory                  
          conduct against petitioner.  Such reprisal was directed at                  
          petitioner, according to the complaint, because of his purported            
          endeavor to inform various government agencies and officials of             
          the dire conditions then prevalent in the District’s                        
          developmentally disabled housing program.  Petitioner’s damages             
          were enumerated in the complaint as comprising “emotional and               
          mental anguish, humiliation and embarrassment, ridicule, physical           
          pain and physical upset, damage to [petitioner’s] professional              
          reputation, and damage to his reputation in the community.”                 
               Petitioner did not serve the complaint on the District.                
          Petitioner’s reason for this was to preserve the viability of one           
          or both of the asserted claims from the pending expiration of the           
          period of limitations without impeding the progress of the                  
          settlement negotiations, which had reached a critical juncture.             
               Petitioner entered into a settlement agreement and general             
          release with the District on May 14, 2001 (the settlement).  The            






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011