Jesse and Tawara Goode - Page 14

                                        -14-                                          
          By contrast, petitioner’s brief attributes his symptoms                     
          exclusively to the putative Graham assault: “Ms. Graham’s                   
          offensive conduct was the only predicate for the injuries * * *             
          [petitioner] sustained, and, hence, the basis for the * * *                 
          [District’s] decision to settle * * * [petitioner’s] claim for              
          physical pain and suffering.”                                               
               Additionally, the allocation of the disputed amount was not            
          apparently contested by the District during the course of the               
          settlement negotiations with petitioner, and thus, the                      
          designation of the proceeds is not consonant with the nature of             
          petitioner’s underlying claims.  Petitioner’s complaint against             
          the District contains no mention or allusion to the putative                
          Graham assault.  Petitioner’s explanation for such conspicuous              
          omission was that the complaint, which was never served on the              
          District, was filed close to the expiration of the period of                
          limitations for one or both of the causes of action, and was                
          drafted in a sterile manner without reference to the putative               
          Graham assault so as not to disrupt the progress of the                     
          settlement negotiations.  Apart from petitioner’s self-serving              
          testimony, however, there is no evidence present in the record to           
          establish that the putative Graham assault ever occurred.                   
               Moreover, Teal testified at trial that the District’s                  
          standard settlement agreements, utilized to resolve disputes of a           
          similar nature to that involving petitioner, were relatively                






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011