Jesse and Tawara Goode - Page 12

                                        -12-                                          
          settlement allocation was not the result of quid pro quo                    
          negotiations, but the product of unfettered, unilateral                     
          draftsmanship by petitioner, who formulated the provision solely            
          for tax considerations.                                                     
               Furthermore, the allocation of the disputed settlement                 
          amount does not satisfy the exclusion provided in the final                 
          sentence of section 104(a) concerning reimbursement of expenses             
          for emotional distress-related medical treatment.  While the                
          allocation of the disputed settlement amount identifies “out-of-            
          pocket” expenses as a general, catchall compensatory item, in               
          addition to the payments specified as “pursuant to section                  
          104(a)(2)”, the record contains no evidence reflecting any                  
          medical expenses petitioner may have incurred.                              
               The bona fide nature of petitioner’s averred symptoms was              
          substantiated by the testimony of Arabella Teal (Teal), a former            
          official in the District’s Office of the Corporation Counsel and            
          the District’s principal representative in the settlement.  In              
          stating that she could not recall requesting, receiving, or                 
          reviewing any medical documentation corroborating petitioner’s              
          illness, Teal remarked that the settlement discussions did                  
          include petitioner’s “emotional and physical reaction to what had           
          happened, because that’s one of the things that [the District]              
          had to evaluate in terms of deciding whether to settle the case.”           
          (Emphasis added.)  Teal stated that although she may have                   






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011