- 18 - District Court entered an order declining to take any action in response to the letter submitted by Michael Hoover and Tadd Hoover. Collection Actions On June 28, 1999, respondent made a jeopardy assessment of petitioner’s deficiencies, and penalties for 1989, 1990, 1991, and 1992. On that same date, respondent sent to petitioner a Notice of Jeopardy Levy and Right of Appeal, which stated: I am notifying you that I have found that you have consistently attempted to conceal your reportable income and assets through the use of nominees, thereby putting our collection of the income tax you owe for the tax period(s) in jeopardy. Therefore, * * * I have approved the issuance of a levy to collect the amount your [sic] owe, although we have not provided you a notice of intent to levy and/or notice of your right to a hearing, generally required by Sections 6330 and 6331 * * * Respondent’s notice of jeopardy levy and right to appeal informed petitioner that he was entitled to request (1) an administrative review under section 7429 and (2) a collection due process hearing pursuant to section 6330. Two days later, respondent sent a letter to petitioner informing him that respondent had made a jeopardy assessment pursuant to section 6861 regarding petitioner’s tax years 1989, 1990, 1991, and 1992. The letter notified petitioner that respondent has “found you [petitioner] consistently attempted to conceal your reportable income and assets through the use of nominees, thereby tending to prejudice or render ineffectualPage: Previous 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011