Steven A. and Patricia A. Knish - Page 4

                                         -4-                                          
          September 2001, respectively.  Petitioners and SPK attached                 
          copies of the Forms 3115 they had filed to their returns for                
          2000.  The returns for 2000 and 2001 reflected that petitioners             
          and SPK each used the mark-to-market method of accounting for               
          their securities trading activity.  Petitioners and SPK each                
          reported ordinary losses for both years.  Petitioners reported              
          their own ordinary losses as well as their 100-percent share of             
          SPK’s ordinary losses for both years, totaling $2,333,698 in 2000           
          and $2,985,149 in 2001.                                                     
               Petitioners claimed a net operating loss for 2001 due to the           
          ordinary securities trading losses.  Petitioners seek to carry              
          this net operating loss back to tax years 1996 through 1999                 
          pursuant to section 172.  Petitioners accordingly applied for               
          tentative refunds for 1996, 1997, 1998, and 1999, which                     
          respondent disallowed.                                                      
          Petitioners’ and SPK’s Requests for Letter Rulings                          
               Petitioners and SPK both requested that respondent issue               
          letter rulings concerning the effectiveness of their mark-to-               
          market election under section 475(f) for 2000.  Petitioners and             
          SPK also stated in their ruling requests that they should be                
          granted administrative relief from a late election under section            
          9100.  Petitioners and SPK each withdrew their requests for                 
          letter rulings when they learned that the pending letter ruling             
          requests would be decided adversely to them.                                








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011