Steven A. and Patricia A. Knish - Page 9

                                         -9-                                          
          October 2001, and SPK filed its election statement in September             
          2001 with respect to their returns for 2000.  They did not attach           
          any election statements to their returns for 1999.  The election            
          statements they did file were each nearly 18 months late.                   
          Accordingly, we conclude that petitioners and SPK did not make              
          effective mark-to-market elections in compliance with Rev. Proc.            
          99-17, supra, for tax year 2000.                                            
               Petitioners argue in the alternative that their and SPK’s              
          ineffective attempts to make mark-to-market elections for 2000              
          should nevertheless be construed as valid elections for 2001.  We           
          disagree.  Petitioners have not cited any authority for us to               
          ignore the year in which they designated the election to be                 
          effective.  There is no basis in Rev. Proc. 99-17, supra, to                
          construe the unsuccessful attempted mark-to-market elections for            
          2000 to be effective elections for 2001 instead.  Rev. Proc. 99-            
          17, supra, requires that the statement used to make the election            
          specify the first taxable year for which the election is                    


               3(...continued)                                                        
          to-market election rules very promptly after enactment of the               
          law.  See Notice 93-45, 1993-2 C.B. 334; see also Taxpayer Relief           
          Act of 1997, Pub. L. 105-34, sec. 1001(d)(2)(B), (4)(B)(i), 111             
          Stat. 908.  The requirement to make the mark-to-market election             
          before the year it is to be effective in Rev. Proc. 99-17, supra,           
          is therefore consistent with the prospective operation of sec.              
          475 indicated by the transition rules’ prompt identification                
          requirements.  We also note that new taxpayers (those for which             
          no tax return was required to be filed for the year preceding the           
          election year) may make a mark-to-market election in the first              
          year of their existence by placing a statement in their books and           
          records within a certain time.  Rev. Proc. 99-17, sec. 5.03,                
          1999-1 C.B. at 504.  While petitioners and SPK are not new                  
          taxpayers under this provision, we note that the requirements of            
          Rev. Proc. 99-17, supra, are not as onerous as petitioners imply.           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011