Helen M. Korchak - Page 2

                                        - 2 -                                         
          items notice), respondent determined for the taxable year 1982 of           
          petitioner and Mr. Korchak additions to tax under sections1                 
          6653(a)(1)(A),2 6653(a)(1)(B),2 and 6659 of $7,019.40, 50 percent           
          of the interest due on an assessed deficiency of $140,388, and              
          $34,322.10, respectively.3                                                  
               The only issue remaining for decision is whether petitioner            
          is entitled to relief under section 6015(b) or, in the alterna-             
          tive, under section 6015(f) with respect to her taxable year                
          1982.  We hold that petitioner is entitled to relief under                  
          section 6015(b) with respect to that year.                                  


               1All section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in            
          effect for the year at issue.                                               
               2In Korchak v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2005-244, see infra            
          note 3, respondent conceded that the affected items notice                  
          incorrectly referred to sec. 6653(a)(1)(A) and (B), instead of to           
          sec. 6653(a)(1) and (2).                                                    
               3On Feb. 28, 2005, respondent and petitioner entered into a            
          stipulation to be bound (stipulation to be bound) by the final              
          decision in Korchak v. Commissioner, docket No. 22105-03.  That             
          case, which was based upon the affected items notice issued to              
          petitioner and Mr. Korchak, was commenced in the Court by Mr.               
          Korchak.  The issue presented there was whether the deficiency in           
          tax that respondent assessed pursuant to Madison Recycling                  
          Associates v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2001-85, affd. 295 F.3d              
          280 (2d Cir. 2002), for the taxable year 1982 of petitioner and             
          Mr. Korchak is subject to additions to tax under secs. 6653(a)              
          and 6659.  In the opinion that the Court issued in the case                 
          involving Mr. Korchak, Korchak v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2005-            
          244, the Court sustained respondent’s determinations under secs.            
          6653(a) and 6659.  On Oct. 20, 2005, the Court entered its                  
          decision in that case, which became final on Jan. 18, 2006.  In             
          the stipulation to be bound, petitioner retained the right to               
          assert that she is entitled to relief under sec. 6015(b) or                 
          (f) with respect to her taxable year 1982.                                  





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011