- 61 - On the record before us, we find that petitioner would suffer an economic hardship if she were required to pay the 1982 total liability. With respect to the tax compliance factor, petitioner contends, and respondent does not dispute, that she complied with the tax laws for her taxable years following her taxable year 1982. Based upon our examination of the entire record before us, we find that, taking into account all the facts and circum- stances, it is inequitable to hold petitioner liable for the deficiency in, and additions to, tax (as well as interest thereon as provided by law) attributable to the understatement in the 1982 joint tax return. On that record, we further find that petitioner satisfies section 6015(b)(1)(D) for her taxable year 1982. Conclusion Based upon our examination of the entire record before us, we find that petitioner is entitled to relief under section 6015(b) with respect to her taxable year 1982.35 We have considered all of the parties’ contentions and arguments that are not discussed herein, and we find them to be without merit, irrelevant, and/or moot. 35In light of our finding that petitioner is entitled to relief under sec. 6015(b) with respect to her taxable year 1982, we need not address petitioner’s alternative claim for relief under sec. 6015(f) for that year.Page: Previous 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011