William H. and Jo Anne Lindley - Page 13

                                       - 13 -                                         
          were seeking an offer-in-compromise based on doubt as to                    
          liability, doubt as to liability is no longer at issue.9                    
               The Secretary may compromise a tax liability based on doubt            
          as to collectibility where the taxpayer’s assets and income are             
          less than the full amount of the assessed liability.  Sec.                  
          301.7122-1(b)(2), Proced. & Admin. Regs.  Generally, under the              
          Commissioner’s administrative pronouncements, an offer-in-                  
          compromise based on doubt as to collectibility will be acceptable           
          only if it reflects the taxpayer’s reasonable collection                    
          potential.  Rev. Proc. 2003-71, sec. 4.02(2), 2003-2 C.B. 517,              
          517.  In some cases, the Commissioner will accept an offer of               
          less than the reasonable collection potential if there are                  
          “special circumstances”.  Id.  Special circumstances are:  (1)              
          Circumstances demonstrating that the taxpayer would suffer                  
          economic hardship if the IRS were to collect from him an amount             
          equal to the reasonable collection potential; or (2)                        
          circumstances justifying acceptance of an amount less than the              
          reasonable collection potential of the case based on public                 
          policy or equity considerations.  See IRM sec. 5.8.4.3(4).                  

               9  Petitioners did not present testimony or exhibits to                
          substantiate doubt as to liability.  Further, petitioners did not           
          address doubt as to liability in their opening brief.  In his               
          answering brief, respondent asserts that petitioners abandoned              
          their doubt as to liability argument.  Petitioners did not                  
          challenge this assertion in their reply brief.  Based on the                
          above, we conclude that petitioners have abandoned their doubt as           
          to liability argument.                                                      





Page:  Previous  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011