Bruce K. and Marina V. Ney - Page 16

                                       - 15 -                                         
          Commissioner nevertheless disallowed the claimed deduction                  
          because the taxpayers had failed to strictly comply with the                
          requirements set forth in the regulations.  The taxpayers sought            
          review in this Court.                                                       
               To decide whether the doctrine of substantial compliance               
          applied, the Court examined whether the requirements of the                 
          regulations are mandatory or directory with respect to the                  
          purpose of section 170.  Id. at 41.  We held that                           
               At the outset, it is apparent that the essence of                      
               section 170 is to allow certain taxpayers a charitable                 
               deduction for contributions made to certain                            
               organizations.  It is equally apparent that the                        
               reporting requirements of section 1.170A-13, Income Tax                
               Regs., are helpful to respondent in the processing and                 
               auditing of returns on which charitable deductions are                 
               claimed.  However, the reporting requirements do not                   
               relate to the substance or essence of whether or not a                 
               charitable contribution was actually made.  We                         
               conclude, therefore, that the reporting requirements                   
               are directory and not mandatory. * * * [Id.]                           
               The Court then concluded that because the taxpayers had                
          provided substantially all of the information specified in the              
          regulations, “The denial of a charitable deduction * * * would              
          constitute a sanction which is not warranted or justified.”  Id.            
          at 42.  We noted, however, that Bond was not a case where the               
          taxpayers failed to obtain a timely appraisal of the donated                
          property and thereby failed to establish its value.  Id.                    
               Petitioners argue that, like the taxpayers in Bond, they               
          substantially complied with the regulations.  Denying them a                







Page:  Previous  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011