- 20 - did not obtain a qualified appraisal within the specified period, however, this exception does not apply. We conclude that petitioners did not substantially comply with section 1.170A-13(c), Income Tax Regs. Accordingly, petitioners are not entitled to a noncash charitable contribution deduction. III. Petitioners’ Remaining Arguments Petitioners raise a number of additional arguments regarding the issue of substantial compliance, as well as other issues in their case. We address these arguments below. A. Curing a Failure To Comply With the Regulations Petitioners argue that, “taken as a whole”, the documents they provided to respondent--including the 2005 appraisals-- satisfy the requirements of the regulations. Although petitioners did not obtain or provide all of the documents within the prescribed period, petitioners contend they should be allowed to cure any defects in the original appraisals and the appraisal summary. We disagree. DEFRA section 155 provides that the appraisal summary must be attached to the taxpayer’s tax return and signed by the qualified appraiser. See DEFRA sec. 155(a)(1)(B). Thus, the qualified appraisal and the appraisal summary must be completed no later than the due date of the tax return. As discussed supra, while the regulations provide limited relief from certainPage: Previous 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011