Lois E. Ordlock - Page 39

                                        - 39 -                                        
          rejecting this suggestion, the preamble cited, inter alia, United           
          States v. Stolle, 86 AFTR 2d 5180, 2000-1 USTC par. 50,329 (C.D.            
          Cal. 2000).  In Stolle, the District Court held that under                  
          California community property law, “community property tax is               
          available to satisfy a debt from either spouse, even if the other           
          spouse is not responsible for the debt.”  Id. at 5186, 2000-1               
          USTC par. 50,329, at 83,981.  Accordingly, the court reasoned,              
          for purposes of determining the validity of a tax lien against              
          spouses’ community property, it was “irrelevant” whether the wife           
          was an innocent spouse under section 6015(b).  Id.  The court               

               7(...continued)                                                        
               One commentator suggested that the regulations adopt a                 
               rule that the IRS would not look to community property                 
               as a collection source when a requesting spouse with an                
               interest in such community property is granted relief                  
               under section 6015.  A federal tax lien arising under                  
               section 6321 attaches to all property and rights to                    
               property of the taxpayer.  Whether a taxpayer has an                   
               interest in property to which the lien can attach is                   
               determined by state law.  Aquilino v. United States,                   
               363 U.S. 509 (1960).  Once that property interest is                   
               defined, federal law alone determines the consequences                 
               resulting from the attachment of the federal lien on                   
               the property.  United States v. Drye, 528 U.S. 49                      
               (1999).  If under the law of the community property                    
               state in which the spouses reside, the IRS can look to                 
               community property to collect a liability of one of the                
               spouses, the determination that the other spouse is                    
               entitled to relief under section 6015 does not affect                  
               the Service’s ability to collect the nonrequesting                     
               spouse’s liability from the community property.  See,                  
               e.g., United States v. Stolle, 2000-1 U.S.T.C. � 50,329                
               (C.D. Cal. 2000); Hegg v. IRS, 28 P.3d 1004 (Idaho                     
               2001).  The final regulations do not adopt this                        
               recommendation because it goes beyond the scope of the                 
               statute.  [T.D. 9003, 2002-2 C.B. 294, 297.]                           





Page:  Previous  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011